Sohbet: İran’ın Bugünkü Hali Üzerine

Aziz kardeşlerim…

Dünya yine bir kuvvet muvazenesi içindedir.
Ortadoğu’da taşlar yerinden oynamaktadır.

Bugün konuşulan meselelerden biri de İran’dır.

Bakınız…

İran uzun yıllardır ambargo altında. Ekonomik baskı altında. Siyasi baskı altında. Ama çöktü mü? Çökmedi. Sekiz sene Irak’la harp etti, yine ayakta kaldı. Şimdi de yaptırımlarla mücadele ediyor, yine ayakta kalmaya çalışıyor.

Demek ki mesele sadece ekonomik mesele değildir. Mesele sabır meselesidir, direnç meselesidir, strateji meselesidir.

Şimdi soralım:
İran neden bu kadar gündemde?

Çünkü bölgede bağımsız hareket etmek isteyen bir devlet. Çünkü Batı’nın çizdiği sınırlar içinde kalmak istemiyor. Çünkü İsrail’le açıktan karşı karşıya gelen az sayıdaki ülkelerden biri.

Kuvvet muvazenesi değişiyor mu? Değişiyor.

Bir tarafta Amerika var.
Bir tarafta Çin ve Rusya var.
Ortada bölge ülkeleri var.

İran bu büyük güçler arasında denge siyaseti yürütüyor.
Petrolü var. Doğalgazı var. Coğrafi konumu çok kritik.

Hürmüz Boğazı dediğin yer dünya ticaretinin can damarı.

Onun için mesele sadece İran meselesi değil. Mesele enerji meselesi. Mesele güvenlik meselesi. Mesele İsrail’in güvenliği meselesi. Mesele Körfez dengesi meselesi.

Şimdi bakıyoruz…

İçeride ekonomik sıkıntı var. Halkta huzursuzluk var. Genç nüfus çok. Beklentiler yüksek. Dünya ile bağlantı güçlü. Sosyal medya var. Baskı var, karşı baskı var.

Devlet diyor ki: “Direneceğiz.”
Halk diyor ki: “Geçim zor.”

Bu da ayrı bir imtihandır.

Ama şunu unutmayın kardeşlerim…

Hiçbir devlet ebedi kuvvet sahibi değildir.
Hiçbir kriz de ebedi sürmez.

Bölgede herkes birbirini tartıyor. Kim doğrudan savaşa girecek? Kim vekâlet savaşı yürütecek? Kim ekonomik baskıyla sonuç alacak?

Şu an görünen şudur:

Kimse büyük bir savaşı göze almak istemiyor.
Ama kimse geri adım da atmıyor.

Bu da gerginliği artırıyor.

İran’ın önünde üç yol var gibi görünüyor:

1. Sertlik siyasetiyle devam etmek.
2. Kademeli yumuşama ve diplomasi.
3. İç reformlarla denge kurmak.

Hangisi ağır basacak? Bunu zaman gösterecek.

Fakat şunu bilin:

Bölgede kuvvet boşluğu oluştuğu zaman mutlaka biri doldurur. Irak zayıfladı, başka dengeler çıktı. Suriye zayıfladı, başka aktörler girdi. Eğer İran zayıflarsa bölge yeniden şekillenir.

Onun için mesele sadece İran’ın iç meselesi değildir.
Ortadoğu’nun geleceği meselesidir.

Bizim için ders nedir?

Kuvvet sadece silahla olmaz.
Ekonomiyle olur.
Birlikle olur.
Adaletle olur.
Halkın rızasıyla olur.

Bir devlet halkıyla barışık değilse uzun vadede ayakta kalamaz.
Bir devlet dış dengeleri okuyamazsa yalnız kalır.

Allah milletlere de imtihan verir. Devletlere de imtihan verir.

Bugün İran imtihandadır.
Yarın başka bir devlet imtihanda olur.

Mühim olan hikmetle hareket etmek, öfkeyle değil.
Stratejiyle hareket etmek, sloganla değil.

Zahirde fırtına olabilir.
Ama her fırtına yıkım getirmez.
Bazı fırtınalar temizler.

Allah hayırlısını nasip etsin.
Bölgeye akıl, itidal ve adalet versin.

Amin.

 

---

Bismillāh ir-Raḥmān ir-Raḥīm.

Madad yā Sultān al-Awliyā…
Madad yā Sādāt an-Naqshbandiyya…

O people…
O believers…
O sleepers of this age…

The world is shaking!

Not from bombs alone.
Not from missiles alone.
It is shaking because the balance is moving!

Today they speak about Iran.
Tomorrow they will speak about another.

Do you think this is politics only?
No!

This is Qadar moving!

When Allah moves a nation, no intelligence agency can stop it.
When Allah tests a State, no alliance can protect it.

Iran is under pressure.
Sanctions. Isolation. Economic tightening.

Like a believer in khalwah!
Locked in a room!

When you lock the ego in khalwah, what happens?

It screams!
It rebels!
Or it submits!

A nation under pressure does the same.

Either it becomes purified —
Or it becomes hardened.

Listen carefully!

No state survives on rockets alone.
No state survives on slogans alone.

If justice leaves — barakah leaves.
If oppression enters — collapse begins.

You think collapse comes with tanks?

No!

Collapse begins when trust dies.

When people’s hearts withdraw, the walls follow.

Ottomans did not fall at Vienna.
They fell when hearts became tired.

Iran today is standing between fire and water.

If it chooses anger — fire.
If it chooses wisdom — water.

And wisdom is harder!

To fight is easy.
To reform is difficult.

The Prophet ﷺ was victorious not only by sword —
But by balance.

O leaders of nations!

Fear the sigh of your people!
Fear the silent prayer of the oppressed!

Because Allah delays — but does not neglect.

You think America is permanent?
You think Russia is permanent?
You think China is permanent?

Where is Rome?
Where is Persia?
Where is Andalus?

Gone!

Only Allah remains.

So what is the lesson?

If the inner state reforms, the outer state stabilises.
If the nafs rules, downfall begins.

Today Iran.
Tomorrow another.

Do not be drunk with geopolitics.
Be awake with basirah!

This is an age of transition.
Empires shifting.
Energy routes changing.
Alliances trembling.

But the real earthquake is spiritual.

O believers!

Make your hearts strong.
Because the coming years will test minds.

If justice stands — stability stands.
If justice falls — maps change.

Allah gives power.
Allah removes power.

That is the only permanent doctrine.

Allāhu Akbar.

---

II.

1. Qur’anic Foundations of Political Cycles

Allah Most High declares:

“Tilka al-ayyām nudāwiluhā bayna an-nās.”
“These days We alternate among people.” (Āl ‘Imrān 3:140)

This verse establishes a foundational doctrine of cyclical power transfer.

In classical tafsir — including al-Ṭabarī and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī — alternation of power is not random but a moral consequence.

Likewise:

“Inna Allāha lā yughayyiru mā bi-qawmin ḥattā yughayyirū mā bi-anfusihim.” (13:11)

Political stability is tied to internal moral condition.

Ottoman political theorists such as Kınalızade Ali Efendi (in Ahlâk-ı Alâî) articulated governance as a triangle:

Justice (‘adl)

Order (nizām)

Public trust (riḍā al-‘āmma)

Without justice, order collapses.

2. Ibn Khaldūnian Insight

In the Muqaddimah, Ibn Khaldūn describes:

Asabiyyah (group cohesion) precedes power.

Luxury weakens cohesion.

External attack finalises decline but does not initiate it.

Thus sanctions alone cannot collapse a state unless internal cohesion weakens.

3. Ottoman Legal Maxim

The classical maxim:

“Adl mülkün temelidir.”
Justice is the foundation of sovereignty.

This phrase appears in multiple Ottoman court inscriptions and reflects the hadith-based ethic of governance.

4. Strategic Implication in Islamic Thought

Islamic jurisprudence recognises:

Preservation of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs)

Preservation of property (ḥifẓ al-māl)

Preservation of order (ḥifẓ al-niẓām)

Economic suffocation undermines ḥifẓ al-māl, but repression undermines ḥifẓ al-nafs.

Thus a balanced State must preserve both.

5. Eschatological Awareness

While not apocalyptic, Islamic tradition recognises instability before major transitions.

However, scholars warn against deterministic readings.

Policy must remain grounded in causality (asbāb), not fatalism.

III. A Pure Strategic White Paper (Policy-Level)

Iran occupies a structurally critical position in regional and global strategic architecture. Current tensions represent managed escalation rather than imminent full-scale conflict.

Key Strategic Variables

1. Energy Security
   • Strait of Hormuz handles approximately 20% of global oil trade.
   • Iranian disruption capability is asymmetrical but impactful.
2. Regional Security Balance
   • Iran functions as:
     • Counterweight to Gulf states
     • Strategic adversary to Israel
     • Tactical partner to Russia
     • Energy partner to China
3. Domestic Stability Factors
   • Demographic youth bulge
   • Sanctions-induced inflation
   • Political centralisation
   • Civil dissatisfaction risk
4. Escalation Scenarios

Scenario	Probability	Impact
Controlled Proxy Escalation	High	Regional instability
Direct Iran-Israel Conflict	Moderate	High
Diplomatic De-escalation	Moderate	Stabilising
Internal Political Fracture	Low-Moderate	Structural

Strategic Assessment

• No major actor currently seeks total war.
• Escalation remains calibrated.
• Internal cohesion is the decisive variable.

Policy Recommendations

1. Encourage calibrated diplomatic engagement.
2. Reduce economic suffocation that increases radicalisation.
3. Maintain deterrence without humiliation strategies.
4. Monitor internal legitimacy metrics.

Long-Term Outlook

Iran’s trajectory depends on:

• Internal reform capacity.
• Leadership adaptability.
• Economic diversification.
• Managed external rivalry.

Collapse is not imminent.
Transformation is possible.
Escalation remains manageable but fragile.

---

1) Eschatological Islamic Geopolitical Analysis

Method: “Signs as moral lenses, not calendars”

In Sunni tradition, ashrāṭ al-sā‘ah (signs of the Hour) are primarily ethical warnings and fitnah-mapping tools—not a timetable for predicting headlines. The danger is turning narrations into “date-setting” or using them to justify present-day violence (which is haram and a category error). The safer, classical approach is: fitan narrations train vigilance, patience, and discernment, especially in periods of propaganda and fear.

A. Fitnah dynamics as a diagnostic for modern statecraft

Many end-times narrations emphasise confusion, deception, speed of events, and social polarization. In the Dajjāl narrations, the Prophet ﷺ describes a period of intense distortion and disorientation, including time perception and mass persuasion.
Geopolitically, this maps well onto today’s reality: narrative warfare, information saturation, and psychological operations shaping policy decisions faster than material facts.

Policy implication (non-theological): states that cannot manage “perception shocks” (viral crises, rumor cascades, panic economics) become strategically brittle—even if they possess hard power.

B. The Levant corridor and symbolic geography

Classical narrations locate major end-times turmoil in a corridor associated with al-Shām (Greater Syria) and its surrounding theaters (Iraq, Palestine). The Dajjāl report explicitly situates emergence between Syria and Iraq.
This does not mean every conflict there is “the one,” but it does explain why the region is repeatedly interpreted as a “high-signal zone” in Muslim consciousness—and therefore remains emotionally primed, politically combustible, and easy to mobilise.

C. “Isa ﷺ will end the great deception” — a restraint on apocalyptic militancy

The descent of ‘Īsā ibn Maryam (peace be upon him) and the end of the Dajjāl fitnah emphasises a core Sunni lesson: ultimate closure belongs to Divine decree, not vigilante actors. Narrations describe that ‘Īsā (عليه السلام) will end that fitnah.
Meaning for today: avoid “messianic geopolitics” (leaders or movements claiming providential destiny). Such psychology often accelerates war.

D. Iran’s role through an eschatological “fitnah lens”

Even when Iran is not named explicitly in sahih narrations, the fitnah template applies:

• Pressure + isolation → internal moral tests: justice, corruption, public trust

• Hard deterrence + symbolic ideology → external escalation risks

• Narrative battles (religion, identity, resistance) → high mobilisation potential

So the eschatological integration here is not “Iran = X prophecy,” but: modern Iran sits in a geography and strategic posture where fitnah dynamics amplify, and where policy choices easily become sacralised.

---

2) Comparative Iran–Late Ottoman Study

Thesis: both face “encirclement + fiscal strain + legitimacy contests,” but differ in system type and external structure.

A. Late Ottoman structural pressures (roughly 1839–1908)

Key late-Ottoman dynamics:

1. Reform under external pressure: the Tanzimat reforms sought to modernise administration, taxation, and legal order—partly to resist European leverage.

2. Centralisation tradeoff: modernisation and centralisation sometimes removed older balancing mechanisms and created new brittleness.

3. Capitulations & economic constraint: European economic privilege and debt dynamics narrowed sovereignty (a classic “policy space compression” problem). (This is a standard theme in Ottoman reform/imperialism literature.)

4. Legitimacy competition: Ottomanism, Islamism, and emerging nationalisms competed as integrative narratives (cohesion politics).

B. Contemporary Iran’s analogous pressures

1. Sanctions as a modern “capitulations-like” constraint: not identical, but similarly compresses policy space and channels elites into survival logics.

2. Centralisation vs social complexity: a young, connected population + economic stress makes legitimacy management harder.

3. External encirclement narratives: Iran frames itself as resisting hegemony; adversaries frame Iran as destabilising—mutual securitisation locks escalation.

C. Critical divergences

1. System structure: Ottoman Empire was a multi-ethnic imperial polity facing nationalist fragmentation; Iran is a nation-state with different cohesion mechanics.

2. Energy leverage: Iran’s energy geography is far more central to global markets than late Ottoman trade chokepoints in the same way; Hormuz is a global artery.

3. Multipolar external environment: the Ottomans faced a more consolidated European imperial system; Iran operates in a more fragmented multipolar context (U.S.–China–Russia competition), which sometimes creates bargaining room.

D. Ottoman lesson most relevant to Iran (policy-grade)

Reform under siege fails when it is perceived as either:

• capitulation to external coercion, or

• elite engineering detached from public welfare.

The Ottoman record shows how reform can unintentionally create new weaknesses if it centralises without restoring legitimacy and economic function.

---

3) Predictive 10-Year Forecast Model (2026–2036)

What this is (and isn’t)

This is a scenario-and-indicator model, not prophecy. It forecasts based on structural drivers and observable triggers.

A. Core variables (the “engine”)

V1 — External pressure index: sanctions intensity, enforcement, diplomatic isolation
V2 — Domestic legitimacy index: inflation/real wages, youth employment, corruption trust, security crackdown severity
V3 — Deterrence stability: Iran–Israel/U.S. thresholds, proxy activation, missile/drone incident rate
V4 — Energy chokepoint risk: Hormuz disruption probability, shipping insurance spikes, naval posture
V5 — Great-power hedge capacity: depth of China/Russia economic/security support, and Iran’s room to manoeuvre

Hormuz remains central to global oil flows (~20% of global petroleum liquids consumption equivalent in 2024 per EIA).

B. Four scenarios with probabilities (rolling, not fixed)

S1 — Managed Containment (Baseline) | 40%

• Sanctions persist but with partial workarounds

• Proxy conflict stays mostly bounded

• Domestic strain continues but regime cohesion holds
  Key triggers: steady oil flows; periodic diplomacy; controlled repression.

S2 — Bargained Stabilisation | 25%

• Partial deal: sanctions easing, monitored constraints, regional deconfliction mechanisms

• More investment, lower inflation trend
  Key triggers: credible enforcement + face-saving framework + regional confidence-building.

S3 — Regional Escalation Spiral | 25%

• A sequence of retaliations breaks “calibrated deterrence”

• Shipping disruption episodes, energy shocks
  Key triggers: high-casualty incident; misread red line; Hormuz disruption/near-closure events (recent temporary closures for drills show how sensitive markets are).

S4 — Internal Fracture / Regime Recomposition | 10%

• Not necessarily “collapse,” but significant elite reconfiguration or governance redesign under stress
  Key triggers: sustained economic deterioration + legitimacy collapse + elite splits.

C. Indicator dashboard (what to watch quarterly)

1. Inflation & currency stability (proxy for legitimacy)

2. Youth unemployment + brain drain signals

3. Security-force cohesion (elite unity is decisive)

4. Proxy tempo (attack frequency, sophistication, attribution clarity)

5. Hormuz shipping metrics: insurance premium, rerouting, naval incidents

6. China/Russia deal depth: long-term off take contracts, payments channels, military cooperation

D. Policy recommendations (neutral, statecraft-oriented)

1. Avoid humiliation strategies: they increase hardliner legitimacy and reduce compromise space.

2. Prefer “bounded bargaining” to maximalist demands: durable deals require mutual face-saving.

3. Build deconfliction channels even without détente: hotline architecture reduces escalation by error.

4. Energy-security buffers: strategic reserves, shipping protections, diversified routes.

5. Domestic stabilisation levers: inflation control and corruption restraint reduce radicalisation risk more than propaganda does.

---

When fear rises, fitnah loves it. When anger rises, wisdom disappears. The surest protection is justice (‘adl), restraint (ḥilm), and clear sight (baṣīrah)—in the State and in the self of the citizen.